Stop repeating the same engineering prompts.

Same model and fixture. More complete evidence.

In one transparent synthetic Codex run, a concise reproduction instruction met 6 of 14 published criteria. Bug Reproduction Brief v1.0.1 met 14 of 14 while leaving the same committed fixture unchanged.

Inspect the fixture, prompts, outputs, rubric and token usage

This is one synthetic paired run, not a customer result or a claim that every model, repository or task will improve. The workflow used more tokens and produced a longer answer.

Turn the workflows into a working team practice.

If a repository has too many moving parts for a download-only purchase, request a fixed-scope five-day implementation sprint. We can adapt one workflow to an agreed codebase, exercise the evidence and permission boundaries, and leave a reviewable handoff.

• One repository or one bounded agent workflow
• Read-only discovery first; no credentials or production changes without explicit approval
• One exercised path, recorded verification and handoff notes
• Scope and availability confirmed before any work begins

This is a service enquiry, not a purchase or a promise of access. The self-serve pack remains available below.

Every run ends with evidence

A workflow does not stop at “looks good”. It asks the agent to identify the target, run the relevant checks and report a decision with file-level evidence.

Verdict: APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES / NEEDS DISCUSSION

Critical findings — file:line and required fix
Warnings — risk and supporting evidence
Verification — commands run and actual results
Unknowns — anything the agent could not prove

This is the output contract, not a customer claim. Read the four complete free workflows above before deciding.